As the population of human being burgeons most species of
large carnivores and large herbivores depend on being able to occupy
human-dominated landscapes for survival. This invariably leads to conflicts
between humans and wildlife. Researchers
Neil Carter, assistant professor in the Human-Environment Systems
Research Center in the College of Innovation and Design at Boise State, and
John Linnell, a senior research scientist at the Norwegian Institute for Nature
Research, say, there is a need to develop a more nuanced and realistic
understanding of what this state looks like. They have recently published a
paper titled “Co-Adaptation Is Key to Coexisting with Large Carnivores” in the journal Trends in Ecology and
Evolution. The paper is based on real life situations in North
America, Europe and Asia on species such as wolves, tigers, leopards, lynx and
bears.
The researchers note that large carnivores need larger
ranges than many protected areas afford. This means that carnivores often come
in contact with human populations that are sometimes less than welcoming. They suggest
that mutual adaptations is the key to success, implying that not only do wild
animals have to behaviourally adapt to the presence of humans, but humans also
have to adapt their behavior to the presence of wild animals.
Studies conducted by the authors and their colleagues have
shown that many species of large carnivores show an incredible ability to
occupy heavily modified human-dominated landscapes. Many human societies also
show a wide range of adaptations to the proximity of large carnivores. This
includes changes to the way they keep livestock and the adoption of cultural or
religious practices to "negotiate" their relationship with their wild
neighbours. However, in many areas these
adaptations have been lost, either due to a temporary absence of large
carnivores or in the face of changing social-economic situations. The result is
often severe conflicts of both an economic and social nature.The necessity of
adaptation by both humans and the carnivores is a key first step towards
transforming conflict to coexistence. Conservation efforts that fail to focus
on both halves of the equation are doomed to fail.
A factor for success has to do with realising that a state
of coexistence does not involve an idealized absence of conflict. Rather than
trying to eliminate all risk, which can mean eliminating a species, the authors
explore ways to keep risks below tolerable levels. That involves understanding
what factors influence tolerance. While some communities may not tolerate any
risks from carnivores, others may tolerate high risks because they attribute
carnivores with ecological and cultural benefits that exceed those risks. In
many communities, the priorities of various stakeholder groups are still
sometimes at odds, and there is a reduced trust in authorities. Interventions
such as new policies must take into account local concerns, the authors say,
such as the adoption of novel decision-making strategies that give voice to
varying viewpoints.
The researchers believe that the challenges are surmountable
through the help of community leaders, conservation organizations, and state or
federal agencies. Insights from studies on coexistence "can help reconcile
debates about carnivore conservation in shared landscapes and advance broader
discourses in conservation," they wrote, "such as those related to
rewilding, novel ecosystems, and land-sharing vs. land-sparing."
"In many ways large carnivores represent the ultimate
test for human willingness to make space for wildlife on a shared planet. If it
is possible to find ways to coexist with these species, it should be possible
to coexist with any species", says John Linnell, co-author on the study.
A major chunk of the post is reprinted from materials provided
by Norwegian Institute for Nature
Research