Dynamic performance assessment of protected areas
Christopher P. Barbera, Mark A. Cochranea, b, , Carlos
Souza Jr.b, , Adalberto VerĂssimob
Biological
conservation, Volume 149, Issue 1, May 2012, Pages 6–14
For preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services
protected area networks have been established worldwide, but are they effective
in delivering what has been intended? The authors of this paper say empirical
coarse-scale assessments of this question across large regions, or even
globally, tend to answer “yes”, while fine-scale studies of individual
protected areas often and repeatedly answer “no”.
The researchers conducted a first fine-scale analysis
of Brazil’s extensive Amazonian protected area network (1.8 million km2) and quantitatively
estimated conservation effectiveness against the backdrop of changing human
development pressures in the surrounding landscape. The overall network
maintained intact forest cover for 98.6% of protected forest lands. This is in
tune with previous coarse-scale studies. A detailed examination of 474
individual protected areas gave a different picture.
The researchers say many protected areas (544,800 km2)
experience default protection due to their remoteness only. Some others
(396,100 km2) provided highly effective protection in the face of substantial
human development pressure. 12% (38) of
protected areas failed to protect the 27,300 km2 that they encompass. Another
7% (23) provided only marginal protection for 37,500 km2.
Based on their assessment the authors contend that Comprehensive
landscape assessments of protected area networks, with frequent monitoring at
scales matching the patterns of human-caused disturbances, are necessary to
ensure the conservation effectiveness and long term survival of protected areas
in rapidly changing landscapes. The reiterate that the methods presented here
are globally adaptable to all forested protected areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment