Advancing the Integration of History and Ecology for
Conservation
PÉTER SZABÓ* and RADIM HÉDL
Conservation Biology, Volume 25, Issue 4, pages
680–687, August 2011
Even though the role of humans in shaping current
ecosystems was recognized decades ago, the integration of history and ecology
as conservation too has been difficult.
The researchers here identified four issues that
hinder historical ecological research and discuss possible solutions.
1) Differences in concepts and methods between the
fields of ecology and history are large. The fact is that differences arise
from miscommunication between ecologists and historians. The researchers say
the differences are less substantial than is usually assumed. Cooperation can
be achieved by focusing on the features ecology and history has in common and
through understanding and acceptance of differing points of view.
2) Historical ecological research is often hamstrung by
differences in spatial and temporal scales between ecology and history. The
researchers argue that historical ecological research can only be conducted at
extents for which sources in both disciplines have comparable resolutions.
Researchers must begin by clearly defining the relevant scales for the given
purpose.
3) The periods for which quantitative historical
sources are not easily accessible (before AD 1800) have been neglected in
historical ecological research. However data from periods before 1800 are as
relevant to the current state of ecosystems as more recent data. The
researchers suggest that historical ecologists actively seek out data from
before 1800 and apply analytic methods commonly used in ecology to these data.
4)Humans are not usually considered an intrinsic
ecological factor in current ecological research. In the view of researchers
human societies should be acknowledged as integral parts of ecosystems and
societal processes should be recognized as driving forces of ecosystem change.
No comments:
Post a Comment