Predicting Species Distributions from Samples Collected
along Roadsides
KYLE P. MCCARTHY, ROBERT J. FLETCHER JR,CHRISTOPHER T. ROTA and RICHARD
L. HUTTO
Conservation
Biology
Volume 26, Issue
1, pages 68–77, February 2012
Currently we do not know whether roadside
sampling limits the accuracy of predictions generated by species distribution
models. The researchers here tested whether roadside sampling affects the
accuracy of predictions generated by species distribution models by using a
prospective sampling strategy designed specifically to address this issue. They
built models from roadside data and validated model predictions at paired
locations on unpaved roads and 200 m away from roads, spatially and temporally
independent from the data used for model building.
The researchers
predicted species distributions of 15 bird species on the basis of point-count
data from a landbird monitoring program in Montana and Idaho (U.S.A.). They
used hierarchical occupancy models to account for imperfect detection. The
researchers expected predictions of species distributions derived from
roadside-sampling data would be less accurate when validated with data from
off-road sampling than when it was validated with data from roadside sampling
and that model accuracy would be differentially affected by whether species
were generalists, associated with edges, or associated with interior forest.
Model performance measures (kappa, area under the curve of a receiver operating
characteristic plot, and true skill statistic) did not differ between model
predictions of roadside and off-road distributions of species. Performance
measures did not differ among edge, generalist, and interior species, despite a
difference in vegetation structure along roadsides and off road. 2 of the 15 species were found more likely to
occur along roadsides.
The researchers contend that surveys along
unpaved roads can be a valuable, unbiased source of information for species
distribution models.
No comments:
Post a Comment